Yes, Alpine School District (ASD) conducted a lengthy study and was planning to recommend a configuration option for voter decision in November. However, in June, the Utah state legislature passed HB3003 which said that a district could not put a configuration proposal on the ballot. The rationale was that it may lead to conflicting ballot initatives between a district propsal and a city sponsored interlocal proposal. The legislature detemined that cities, more than districts should have prioroty in making proposals regarding district configurations. According to our poll, this is exactly opposite of what the majority of voters would prefer.

If Alpine School Distirct's (ASD) proposal were on the ballot, then everyone in the district would have been able to vote on it. However, in June the Legislature passed HB3003 which removed  (revoked/eliminated) ASD's ability to put forward a proposal. The law states that only interlocal proposals can go on the ballot and only residents of cities which are part of interlocals can vote on those proposals.  As a result, residents in the south part of the district do not get to vote on any of the proposals.

These are the reasons given by a majority of city leaders. (A few leaders thought that forming an interlocal would have been a good idea.)

In brief -

I live in the west area (Eagle Mountain, Saratoga Springs, Fairfield, or Cedar Fort) and I want the district to split into either 2 or 3.  Vote YES. 

I live in the central area (Lehi, Highland, Draper, Cedar Hills, Alpine or American Fork) and I want the district to split in 2. Vote NO. 

I live in the central area (Lehi, Highland, Draper, Cedar Hills, Alpine or American Fork) and I want the district to split in 3. Vote YES. 

I live in the east area (Pleasant Grove, Lindon, Orem, or Vineyard) and want the district to split. It will not be on your ballot if you live in one of these cities.